Your commercial model doesn't fit the LMS's product model.
Bundles, seat purchases, memberships, and cohort rules built into the platform rather than glued together with coupons, plugins, and manual admin work.
For founders and operations leads who have outgrown their LMS, we build an owned platform around the learner journey, commercial model, and systems you already run.
Discuss your platformCompanies whose product is the learning platform: cohort programmes, professional courses, certification bodies. The LMS decides how the offer can be sold and delivered, which is why it stops being someone else's job to fix.
B2B and B2C providers running blended or on-demand programmes with enterprise buyers, seat allocation, cohort scheduling, and structured reporting back to end clients.
Institutions and networks whose learner base needs role-specific access, SIS or SSO integration, and reporting that a generic LMS cannot produce cleanly.
Bundles, seat purchases, memberships, and cohort rules built into the platform rather than glued together with coupons, plugins, and manual admin work.
Payment providers, identity, and course access wired together as a tested handoff, so a successful sale grants the right access without a human in the middle.
Attempts, versions, expiry, and certificates recorded as structured data with role-scoped reports, so an audit or renewal is a query, not a scramble.
Users, cohorts, progress, and content migrated with a mapping plan, dry-run validation, and a documented rollback path before cutover.
SSO, SIS, LTI 1.3, payments, video, and CRM connections built with typed contracts, retries, and observability rather than one-off scripts.
Learner accounts, catalogue, enrolment, progress, assessments, certificates, and account recovery. Designed for the exact learner journey (self-paced catalogue, mentor-reviewed cohort, or hybrid) rather than a generic 'my courses' tab.
Course publishing, enrolments, roles, cohorts, refunds, and support tools that an operator can use without emailing an engineer. Includes an audit trail so mistakes can be safely reversed.
SSO (SAML, OIDC), SIS, LTI 1.3, payment providers (Stripe, Adyen, PayPal), video (Mux, Vimeo, Cloudflare Stream), CRM, and email, implemented with error handling, retries, and clear logs when a partner API misbehaves.
Role-scoped reports built around real decisions: overdue training by team, cohort completion, revenue by programme, at-risk learners. xAPI-compatible event stream so records stay portable across future systems.
Discovery sessions, a walkthrough of your current learner journey and admin workflows, and a written scope with the risky decisions flagged.
SSO, payment, migration, or reporting path prototyped end to end so vague requirements become tested code, not planning-document phrases.
Live-review environments every week with the real learner and admin flows. Feedback lands in the next slice, not after months of build.
Import validation, role and permission acceptance tests, operational runbooks, and code plus infrastructure handed over with continued support available but not required.
The cost of a custom LMS moves with the same handful of decisions every time: how many distinct learner and admin flows, the shape of the data you're migrating, the integrations you can't avoid (payments, SSO, LTI), and how far reporting has to go beyond dashboards to actual evidence. We would rather scope a smaller first release with a clear second step than pretend every possible feature belongs in version one. Once the plan is specific, so is the number, shared with the assumptions and what would change it.
We scope in the open. You see the assumptions, what is excluded, and what would change the estimate. A fixed price without those details is only a delayed surprise.
SCORM 1.2
Source: ADL / SCORM
The result is a platform your team can explain without apologising for its limits. Learners see a coherent product. Administrators spend less time stitching systems together. And when a new revenue model or teaching idea arrives, you have a codebase that can change with it.
It depends on the hard parts: how many distinct learner flows, how much data you're migrating, the integrations, and the reporting you actually need. We scope a narrow first release with a clear second step and share the assumptions in the open, then quote the specific piece of work. A number without those details is a delayed surprise.
Most focused platforms are usable in 8 to 12 weeks. We work in weekly slices, so you're clicking through the real thing early instead of waiting months for a slide deck.
Yes. At handover you get the application code, deployment docs, and the infrastructure access we agreed in the plan. Ongoing support is available, never required.
Where the API or standard supports it, yes. We confirm identity, payments, content packages, and reporting during technical discovery rather than assuming an integration is simple.
We will map the real constraint, tell you whether a custom build makes sense, and outline a first release that does not pretend to solve every future problem.
Book a 30-minute call